ÎÒ ÐÅÄÀÊÖÈÈ // FROM EDITORS
ÌÅÒËÅÍÊÎÂ Í. Ô., ÊÎÍÅÂÀ Å.Â. ÑÎÖÈÎÄÈÍÀÌÈÊÀ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÉ ÍÀÓÊÈ
NIKOLAY F. METLENKOV, EKATERINA V. KONEVA, SOCIODYNAMICS OF ARCHITECTURAL SCIENCE
ÂÎÇÌÎÆÍÎÑÒÈ ÍÀÓÊÈ // SCIENTIFIC CAPACITY — THE DISCUSSION
ÌÎÈÑÅÅÂ Þ.Ì. ÐÀÑÊÐÛÂÀß ÏÎÒÅÍÖÈÀË ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎ-ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÎÉ ÍÀÓÊÈ
IOURI M. MOISSEEV, DISCLOSING THE POTENTIAL OF ARCHITECTURAL AND URBAN PLANNING SCIENCE
ÁÀÅÂÑÊÈÉ Î.À. ÑÁÀËÀÍÑÈÐÎÂÀÍÍÎÑÒÜ ÈÍÑÒÐÓÌÅÍÒΠÃÎÐÎÄÑÊÎÃÎ ÏËÀÍÈÐÎÂÀÍÈß: ÎÏÛÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍ×ÅÑÊÈÕ ÐÀÁÎÒ ÂÛÑØÅÉ ØÊÎËÛ ÓÐÁÀÍÈÑÒÈÊÈ
OLEG A. BAEVSKY, BALANCE OF URBAN PLANNING INSTRUMENTS: STUDENT EXPERIENCE OF THE HIGHER SCHOOL OF URBAN STUDIES
ÇÀÉÊÎÂÀ Å.Þ. ÌÅÆÄÈÑÖÈÏËÈÍÀÐÍÛÉ ÏÎÄÕÎÄ Â ÍÀÓÊÅ Â ÖÅËßÕ ÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÑÒÂÎÂÀÍÈß ÑÐÅÄÛ
ELENA YU. ZAYKOVA, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH IN SCIENCE IN ORDER TO IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT
ÈÂÀØÊÈÍÀ È.Â., ÊÎ×ÓÐΠÁ.È. ÝÊÎËÎÃÈß ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÑÒÂÀ: ÍÀÏÐÀÂËÅÍÈß ÈÑÑËÅÄÎÂÀÍÈÉ È ÈÍÍÎÂÀÖÈÎÍÍÛÅ ÌÅÒÎÄÛ
IRINA V. IVASHKINA, BORIS I. KOCHUROV, ECOLOGY OF URBAN PLANNING: RESEARCH TRENDS AND INNOVATIVE METHODS
ÊÐÀØÅÍÈÍÍÈÊÎÂ À.Â. ÏÅÐÑÏÅÊÒÈÂÍÛÅ ÌÎÄÅËÈ ÏÎÑÅËÅÍÈÉ
ALEXEY V. KRASHENINNIKOV, PERSPECTIVE MODELS OF SETTLEMENTS
ÊÓËÅØÎÂÀ Ã.È. ÍÀÓ×ÍÎ-ÈÍÍÎÂÀÖÈÎÍÍÛÉ ÊÎÌÏËÅÊÑ ÊÀÊ ÄÐÀÉÂÅÐ ÐÀÇÂÈÒÈß ÐÅÃÈÎÍÎÂ È ÒÐÀÍÑÔÎÐÌÀÖÈÈ ÐÀÑÑÅËÅÍÈß
GALINA I. KULESHOVA, SCIENTIFIC AND INNOVATIVE COMPLEX AS A DRIVER FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONS AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF SETTLEMENT
ÌÎÈÑÅÅÂ Þ.Ì. ÌÅÑÒÎ ÍÀÓÊÈ Â ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÑÒÂÅ: ÇÀÌÅÒÊÈ È ÈÍÒÅÐÏÐÅÒÀÖÈÈ
IOURI M. MOISSEEV, THE LOCUS OF SCIENCE IN URBAN DEVELOPMENT: NOTES AND INTERPRETATIONS
ÒÎÍÊÎÉ È.Â. ÑÖÅÍÀÐÈÈ ÐÀÇÂÈÒÈß ÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÑÒÂÅÍÍÎÉ ÑÒÐÓÊÒÓÐÛ Â ÊÎÍÒÅÊÑÒÅ ÄÈÍÀÌÈÊÈ ÒÅÎÐÈÈ ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÑÒÂÀ. ÔÎÐÌÈÐÎÂÀÍÈÅ ÌÎÄÅËÈ ÐÀÑÑÅËÅÍÈß ÊÐÛÌÀ
IGOR V. TONKOY, SCENARIOS OF THE SPATIAL STRUCTURE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DYNAMICS OF URBAN PLANNING THEORY. FORMATION OF A MODEL OF RESETTLEMENT OF CRIMEA
ØÅÌßÊÈÍÀ Â.À. ÆÈÇÍÅÑÒÎÉÊÎÑÒÎÉÊÈÉ ÃÎÐÎÄ. ÇÀÄÀ×È È ÐÅØÅÍÈß
VERONIKA A. SHEMYAKINA, RESILIENT CITY. OBJECTIVES AND SOLUTIONS
ÙÅÏÅÒÊÎÂ Í.È. ÍÀÓÊÀ Î ÑÂÅÒÅ Â ÒÅÎÐÈÈ È ÈÑÊÓÑÑÒÂÅ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÛ
NIKOLAY. I. SHCHEPETKOV, THE SCIENCE OF LIGHT IN THE THEORY AND ART OF ARCHITECTURE
ÊÎÍÖÅÏÖÈÈ // CONCEPTS
ÀËÅÊÑÅÅ Þ.Â. ÝÂÎËÞÖÈß ÓÑËÎÂÈÉ ÔÎÐÌÈÐÎÂÀÍÈß ÍÀÄÇÅÌÍÛÕ ÒÅÐÐÈÒÎÐÈÉ È Å¨ ÂËÈßÍÈÅ ÍÀ ÎÑÎÁÅÍÍÎÑÒÈ, ÑÏÅÖÈÔÈÊÓ ÎÁÎÑÍÎÂÀÍÈß ÍÀÓ×ÍÎÉ ÏÐÎÁËÅÌÛ È ÃÈÏÎÒÅÇÛ
YURIY V. ALEKSEEV, EVOLUTION OF THE CONDITIONS FOR THE FORMATION OF ABOVE-GROUND TERRITORIES AND ITS IMPACT ON THE FEATURES, SPECIFICS OF SUBSTANTIATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC PROBLEM AND HYPOTHESIS
ÁÀØÈÐÎÂÀ Ý.È., ÄÅÍÈÑÅÍÊÎ Å.Â. ÈÍÍÎÂÀÖÈÎÍÍÛÅ ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÒÅËÜÍÛÅ ÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÑÒÂÀ ÄËß ØÊÎË Â ÑÔÅÐÅ IT
ELZA I. BASHIROVA, ELENA V. DENISENKO, INNOVATIVE LEARNING SPACES FOR IT SCHOOLS
ËÀÇÀÐÅÂÀ Ì.Â. ÔÀÍÒÀÑÒÈ×ÅÑÊÈÅ ÃÎÐÎÄÀ ÁËÈÆÀÉØÅÃÎ ÁÓÄÓÙÅÃÎ
MARIA V. LAZAREVA, FANTASTIC CITIES OF THE NEAR FUTURE
ÌÈÐÕÀÑÀÍÎÂ Ð. Ô. ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÛÉ ÏÀÌßÒÍÈÊ ÊÀÇÀÍÈ ÝÏÎÕÈ ÊÎÍÑÒÐÓÊÒÈÂÈÇÌÀ
RUSTEM F. MIRKHASANOV, ARCHITECTURAL MONUMENT OF KAZAN OF THE CONSTRUCTIVIST ERA
ØÓËÜÃÈÍÎÂÀ Î.À, ÈËÜÂÈÖÊÀß Ñ.Â., ÏÅÒÐÎÂÀ Ë.Â. ÔÎÐÌÎÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÍÈÅ ÀÒÐÈÓÌÍÎÃÎ ÎÁÙÅÑÒÂÅÍÍÎÃÎ ÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÑÒÂÀ Â ÊÎÍÊÓÐÑÍÎÌ ÏÐÅÄËÎÆÅÍÈÈ ÏÎ ÌÎÄÅÐÍÈÇÀÖÈÈ ÊÎÐÏÓÑÎÂ ÃÎÑÓÄÀÐÑÒÂÅÍÍÎÃÎ ÓÍÈÂÅÐÑÈÒÅÒÀ ÏÎ ÇÅÌËÅÓÑÒÐÎÉÑÒÂÓ (ÃÓÇ)
OLGA A. SHULGINOVA, SVETLANA. V. ILVITSKAYA, LARISA V.PETROVA, THE FORMATION OF THE ATRIUM PUBLIC SPACE ON THE EXAMPLE OF A COMPETITIVE PROPOSAL FOR THE MODERNIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL BUILDINGS OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF LAND USE PLANNING
ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÅ ÍÀÑËÅÄÈÅ // ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE
ÌÀÊÑÈÌÎÂ Î.Ã. ÊËÀÑÑÈÊ Â ÊÎÍÑÒÐÓÊÒÈÂÈÇÌÅ È ÊÎÍÑÒÐÓÊÒÈÂÈÑÒ Â ÊËÀÑÑÈÊÅ
OLEG G. MAKSIMOV, CLASSICS IN CONSTRUCTIVISM AND CONSTRUCTIVIST IN CLASSICS
ÏÐÎÔÅÑÑÈÎÍÀËÜÍÀß ÐÅÏËÈÊÀ // PROFESSOONAL REPLICA
ÏÀÍÓÕÈÍ Ï.Â. ÒÐÈ ÎÉÊÓÌÅÍÛ (ÏÎÇÈÖÈÎÍÈÐÎÂÀÍÈÅ ÒÅÐÐÈÒÎÐÈÉ ÊÐÛÌÀ È ÍÎÂÎÐÎÑÑÈÈ ÎÒ ÀÍÒÈ×ÍÛÕ ÂÐÅÌÅÍ ÄÎ ÍÀØÈÕ ÄÍÅÉ)
PETR V. PANUKHIN, THREE ECUMENES (POSITIONING OF THE TERRITORIES OF CRIMEA AND NOVOROSSIYA FROM ANCIENT TIMES TO THE PRESENT DAY)
ÒÅÇÀÓÐÓÑ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÌÅÍÒÀËÈÒÅÒÀ XXI ÂÅÊÀ // THESAURUS
ÌÓÇÛÊÀËÜÍÎ-ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÒÅËÜÍÛÉ ÖÅÍÒÐ (ÊÀÐÒÀØÎÂ À.Ï.)
ÍÅÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÎÅ Â ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÅ (ÊÀÏÓÑÒÈÍ Ï.Â.)
ÀÂÒÎÐÛ ÍÎÌÅÐÀ
