ÑÅÍÒßÁÐÜ, 2020
ÎÒ ÐÅÄÀÊÖÈÈ // FROM EDITORS
ÌÅÒËÅÍÊÎÂ Í.Ô., ÊÎÍÅÂÀ Å.Â. ÂÕÓÒÅÌÀÑ — 100
NIKOLAY F. METLENKOV, EKATERINA V. KONEVA, VÊHUTEMAS — 100
ÊÐÓÃËÛÉ ÑÒÎË — ÂÕÓÒÅÌÀÑ — 100 // VÊHUTEMAS — 100 — THE ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION
ÀÄÀÌÎÂ Î.È. ÏÐÈÐÀÙÅÍÈÅ ÄÅËÀ ÂÕÓÒÅÌÀÑ
OLEG I. ADAMOV, INCREMENT IN THE WORK OF VKHUTEMAS
ÄÀÍÈËÎÂÀ Ý.Â. ÂÕÓÒÅÌÀÑ ÊÀÊ ÔÎÐÌÀ ÀÂÀÍÃÀÐÄÀ
ELINA V. DANILOVA, VKHUTEMAS AS A FORM OF AVANT-GARDE
ÊÀÏÓÑÒÈÍ Ï.Â. ÂÕÓÒÅÌÀÑ: ÂÎÏÐÎÑÛ Ê ÍÎÂÎÌÓ ÎÑÌÛÑËÅÍÈÞ
PETER V. KAPUSTIN, VKHUTEMAS: QUESTIONS FOR NEW RETHINKING
ÎÂÑßÍÍÈÊÎÂÀ Å.Á. ÐÀÖÈÎÍÀËÈÇÌ ÍÈÊÎËÀß ËÀÄÎÂÑÊÎÃÎ È ÅÃÎ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÀß ÏÐÀÊÒÈÊÀ
ELENA B. OVSYANNIKOVA, RATIONALISM OF NIKOLAI LADOVSKY AND HIS ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE
ßÂÅÉÍ Î.È., ßÍÊÎÂÑÊÀß Þ.Ñ. ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÀ ÊÀÊ ÏÎÈÑÊ ÈÑÒÎÊΠÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÑÒÂÅÍÍÎÑÒÈ (ê 100-ëåòèþ ÂÕÓÒÅÌÀÑà)
OLEG I. YAWEIN, YULIA S. YANKOVSKAYA, ARCHITECTURE AS A SEARCH FOR THE ORIGINS OF SPATIALITY (FOR THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF VKHUTEMAS)
ÊÎÍÛØÅÂÀ Å.Â. ÎÒ «ÌÓÍÄÀÍÅÓÌÀ» Ê ÊËÓÁÍÎÌÓ ÊÎÌÏËÅÊÑÓ ×ÒÇ: ÀÍÄÐÅÉ ÁÓÐÎÂ Â ÄÈÀËÎÃÅ Ñ ËÅ ÊÎÐÁÞÇÜÅ
EVGENIYA V. KONYSHEVA, FROM «MUNDANEUM» TO THE CHTZ CLUB COMPLEX: ANDREI BUROV IN DIALOGUE WITH LE CORBUSIER
ËÀÂÐÅÍÒÜÅÂ À.Í. ÏÅÐÂÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ ÑÈÑÒÅÌÛ ÕÓÄÎÆÅÑÒÂÅÍÍÎ-ÏÐÎÌÛØËÅÍÍÎÃÎ ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÍÈß, 1920
A.N. LAVRENTIEV, THE FIRST PROJECT OF THE SYSTEM OF INDUSTRIAL ART EDUCATION, 1920
ÈÂÀÍÎÂÀ-ÂÅÝÍ Ë.È. ÑÕÅÌÀ «ÂÕÓÒÅÌÀÑ» — ÍÎÂÛÉ ÄÎÊÓÌÅÍÒ Ê 100-ËÅÒÍÅÌÓ ÞÁÈËÅÞ
LARISA I. IVANOVA-VEEN, SCHEME «VKHUTEMAS» — A NEW DOCUMENT FOR THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY
ÐÀÑÓËÅÂÀ Þ.Â., ÒÈÌÅÐÁÀÅÂÀ Ñ.Â., ÃÐÈØÈÍ À.À. ÊÎÌÏÎÇÈÖÈÎÍÍÛÅ ÒÐÅÍÀÆÅÐÛ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÂÎÑÏÐÈßÒÈß Â ÒÐÀÄÈÖÈßÕ ÏÑÈÕÎÀÍÀËÈÒÈ×ÅÑÊÎÃÎ ÌÅÒÎÄÀ Í.À. ËÀÄÎÂÑÊÎÃÎ
YULIYA V. RASULEVA, SVETLANA V. TIMERBAEVA, ANTON A. GRISHIN, THE COMPOSITIONAL TRAINING APPARATUS FOR TASTING THE ARCHITECTURAL PERCEPTION IN TRADITION OF PSYCHO-TECHNICAL METHOD OF NIKOLAY LADOVSKY
ÒÈÕÎÍΠÂ.Å., ßÍÓØÊÈÍÀ Þ.Â. ÏÐÎÏÅÄÅÂÒÈ×ÅÑÊÈÅ ÊÎÍÖÅÏÖÈÈ ÂÕÓÒÅÌÀÑÀ  ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÅ ÑÒÀËÈÍÃÐÀÄÀ 1930-Õ ÃÎÄÎÂ. ÎÏÛÒ ËÀÁÎÐÀÒÎÐÈÈ ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÎÑÒÈ, ÏÐÎÂÅÐÅÍÍÛÉ ÂÐÅÌÅÍÅÌ
VICTOR E. TIKHONOV YULIA V. YANUSHKINA, PROPAEDEUTIC CONCEPTS OF VKHUTEMAS IN THE ARCHITECTURE OF STALINGRAD IN THE 1930S. THE EXPERIENCE OF A LABORATORY OF MODERNITY PROVEN BY TIME
ÂÀÑÈËÜÅ Í.Þ. ÒÈÏÎÂÎÅ È ÓÍÈÊÀËÜÍÎÅ Â ÏÎÑÒÐÎÉÊÀÕ Ó×ÅÍÈÊÎÂ È ÏÎÑËÅÄÎÂÀÒÅËÅÉ ËÀÄÎÂÑÊÎÃÎ
NIKOLAI YU. VASSILIEV, TYPICAL AND UNIQUE IN LADOVSKY STUDENTS' AND FOLLOWERS' BUILDINGS
ÑÌÈÐÍÎÂ Ë.Í. ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎ-ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÎÅ ÍÀÑËÅÄÈÅ
ÂÛÏÓÑÊÍÈÊÎÂ È ÏÐÅÏÎÄÀÂÀÒÅËÅÉ ÂÕÓÒÅÌÀÑÀ-ÂÕÓÒÅÈÍÀ Â ÃÎÐÎÄÀÕ ÑÐÅÄÍÅÃÎ ÓÐÀËÀ
LEONID N. SMIRNOV, THE ARCHITECTURAL AND URBAN PLANNING HERITAGE OF VKHUTEMAS/VKHUTEIN'S GRADUATES AND FACULTY IN THE TOWNS AND CITIES OF THE MIDDLE URALS
ØÀÄÐÈÍ À.À. ÈÄÅÈ ÂÎÊÐÓÃ ÂÕÓÒÅÌÀÑÀ Â ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÅ XX-XXI ÂÅÊÎÂ
ALEXANDER A. SHADRIN, THE IDEAS AROUND VKHUTEMAS IN THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE XX-XXI CENTURIES
ÊÐÀÉÑ Á. ÂÄÎÕÍÎÂÅÍÈÅ È ÀÊÒÓÀËÜÍÎÑÒÜ ÂÕÓÒÅÌÀÑ
BARBARA KREIS, INSPIRATION AND ACTUALITY OF VKHUTEMAS
ÏÐÎÔÅÑÑÈÎÍÀËÜÍÀß ÐÅÏËÈÊÀ // PROFESSIONAL REPLICA
ÌÀÊÑÈÌΠÎ.Ã. ÈÂÀÍ ÈËÜÈ× ËÅÎÍÈÄÎÂ… ÎÍ ËÈ ÝÒÎ?
OLEG G. MAKSIMOV, IVAN LEONIDOV… IS IT?
ÊÎÍÖÅÏÖÈÈ // CONCEPTS
ÁÀÐÊÎÂÀ Î.È. ÈÄÅÈ ÌÀÐÊÀ ÃÐÈÃÎÐÜÅÂÈ×À ÌÅÅÐÎÂÈ×À  ÊÎÍÒÅÊÑÒÅ ÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÑÒÂÎÂÀÍÈß ÆÈËÈÙÍÎÃÎ È ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÎÃÎ ÇÀÊÎÍÎÄÀÒÅËÜÑÒÂÀ ÐÎÑÑÈÉÑÊÎÉ ÔÅÄÅÐÀÖÈÈ
OLGA I. BARKOVA, THE IDEAS OF MARK GRIGORIEVICH MEEROVICH IN THE CONTEXT OF THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE HOUSING AND URBAN LEGISLATION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
ÄÎËÃÎÂÀ Â.Î. ÇÀÏÎÂÅÄÍÈÊÈ È ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÅ ÏÀÐÊÈ: ÏÐÎÁËÅÌÛ ÑÎÕÐÀÍÅÍÈß ÏÐÈÐÎÄÛ È ÈÑÒÎÐÈÊÎ-ÊÓËÜÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÍÀÑËÅÄÈß, ÐÀÇÂÈÒÈß ÒÓÐÈÇÌÀ
VIKTORIA O. DOLGOVA, RESERVES AND NATIONAL PARKS: PROBLEMS OF CONSERVATION OF NATURE AND HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE, TOURISM DEVELOPMENT
ÏÀÂËÎÂÀ Â.À. ÐÅÊÀ Â ÃÎÐÎÄÅ. ÐÅÂÈÒÀËÈÇÀÖÈß ÏÐÈÁÐÅÆÍÛÕ ÒÅÐÐÈÒÎÐÈÉ
VERA A. PAVLOVA, RIVER INSIDE THE CITY. REVITALIZATION OF WATERFRONT AREAS
ÝËÜ ÑÅÐÂÈ Ó.Ý.Ì.Ì., ÏÓÑÍÛÉ Ë.À. ÏËÅÍÝÐÍÀß ÏÐÀÊÒÈÊÀ Â ÏÎÄÃÎÒÎÂÊÅ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÎÐÎÂ
W.E.M.M. EL SERVI, LEONID A. PUSNY, PLEIN AIR PRACTICE IN THE TRAINING OF ARCHITECTS
ÒÅÇÀÓÐÓÑ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÌÅÍÒÀËÈÒÅÒÀ XXI âåêà // THESAURUS
Êîòëîâèíà — Êîòëîâàí (Ë.Â. Ïåòðîâà, À.Â. Ðàìáõàòëà)
Òîïîëîãè÷åñêàÿ îïòèìèçàöèÿ â àðõèòåêòóðíîì ôîðìîîáðàçîâàíèè (Ì.Ñ. Ñàëåõ)
ÎÁ ÀÂÒÎÐÀÕ
