ÑÅÍÒßÁÐÜ, 2025
ÌÅÒËÅÍÊΠÍ.Ô. ÊÎÍÅÂÀ Å.Â. ÂÐÅÌß ÄÈÍÀÌÈ×ÅÑÊÎÉ ÏÀÐÀÄÈÃÌÀËÜÍÎÑÒÈ
NIKOLAY F. METLENKOV, EKATERINA V. KONEVA, THE TIME OF DYNAMIC PARADIGMALITY
ÊÎÍÖÅÏÖÈÈ // CONCEPTS
ÁÀÇÈËÅÂÈ× À. Ì. ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎ-ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÀß ÈÍÒÅÐÏÐÅÒÀÖÈß ÊÀÒÅÃÎÐÈÈ «ÑÎÖÈÀËÜÍÎÅ ÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÑÒÂλ
ANATOLY M. BAZILEVICH, ARCHITECTURAL AND URBAN PLANNING INTERPRETATION CATEGORIES OF «SOCIAL SPACE»
ÁÛ×ÊÎÂÀ Ò. Ä. ÀÍÀËÈÇ ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÛÕ ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÛÕ ÒÅÍÄÅÍÖÈÉ È ÂÎÇÌÎÆÍÎÑÒÅÉ ÊÓÐÎÐÒÍÛÕ ÃÎÐÎÄΠ×ÅÐÍÎÌÎÐÑÊÎÃÎ ÏÎÁÅÐÅÆÜß ÐÎÑÑÈÈ
TAISIYA D. BYCHKOVA, ANALYSIS OF MODERN URBAN PLANNING TRENDS AND OPPORTUNITIES OF RESORT TOWNS OF THE BLACK SEA COAST OF RUSSIA
ÈËÞÕÈÍ Ð. È., ÈËÜÂÈÖÊÀß Ñ. Â., ÄÀÍÈËÈÍ À. Â. ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÛÅ ÝÊÎÍÎÌÈ×ÅÑÊÈÅ ÌÎÄÅËÈ Â ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÛÕ ÏÐÎÅÊÒÀÕ ÏÐÈÑÏÎÑÎÁËÅÍÈß
ROMAN I. ILYUKHIN, SVETLANA V. ILVITSKAYA, ALEXANDER V. DANILIN, MODERN ECONOMIC MODELS IN ARCHITECTURAL ADAPTIVE REUSE PROJECTS
ÂÎËÈ×ÅÍÊÎ Î. Â., ÊÀÑÓËÓ Ê. ÏÀÐÀÌÅÒÐÈ×ÅÑÊÀß ÎÖÅÍÊÀ È ÐÅÑÒÀÂÐÀÖÈß ÄÅÐÅÂßÍÍÛÕ ÊÎÍÑÒÐÓÊÖÈÉ ÍÀ ÏÐÈÌÅÐÅ ÑÎÁÎÐÀ ÍÎÒÐ ÄÀÌ
OLGA V. VOLICHENKO, KACHANA KASULU, PARAMETRIC EVALUATION AND RESTORATION OF WOODEN STRUCTURES USING THE EXAMPLE OF NOTRE DAME CATHEDRAL
ÃÐÈÁÊÎÂ À.À. ÏÐÎÁËÅÌÛ ÊÎÝÂÎËÞÖÈÈ ÎÒÊÐÛÒÛÕ ÎÁÙÅÑÒÂÅÍÍÛÕ ÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÑÒÂ
ANTON A. GRIBKOV, PROBLEMS OF CO-EVOLUTION OF OPEN PUBLIC SPACES
ÄÐÅÁÅÇÃÎÂÀ Ì. Þ, ÃÐÀ×ÅÂÀ À. À. ÂËÈßÍÈÅ ÏÐÎÌÛØËÅÍÍÛÕ ÐÅÂÎËÞÖÈÉ ÍÀ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÓ È ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÑÒÂÎ
MARIA Y. DREBEZGOVA, ANASTASIA A. GRACHEVA, THE IMPACT OF INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTIONS ON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN PLANNING
ÊËÎ×ÊÎ À. Ð., ÂÀÒÜßÍ Ê. À. ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎ-ÏËÀÍÈÐÎÂÎ×ÍÛÅ È ÎÁÚÅÌÍÎ-ÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÑÒÂÅÍÍÛÅ ÐÅØÅÍÈß ÄÅÒÑÊÈÕ ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÒÅËÜÍÛÕ ÊÀÌÏÓÑΠÐÎÑÑÈÈ
ASMIK R. KLOCHKO, KRISTINA A. VATYAN, ARCHITECTURAL, PLANNING AND SPATIAL SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL CAMPUSES IN RUSSIA
ÌÀÌÀÊΠÍ. Â., ÊÓÇÅÍÊÎÂÀ Ä. Â. ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÀß ÊÎÍÖÅÏÖÈß ÔÎÐÌÈÐÎÂÀÍÈß ÏÐÀÂÎÑËÀÂÍÎÃÎ ÏÀËÎÌÍÈ×ÅÑÊÎÃÎ ÖÅÍÒÐÀ  ÈÑÒÎÐÈ×ÅÑÊÎÉ ×ÀÑÒÈ Ã. ÊÀÇÀÍÈ
NIKOLAY V. MAMAKOV, DARIA V. KUZENKOVA, URBAN PLANNING CONCEPT FOR THE CREATION OF AN ORTHODOX PILGRIMAGE CENTER IN THE HISTORIC PART OF KAZAN
ÌÀÌÀÊΠÍ. Â., ËÀÍÖΠÀ. À. ÈÍÄÓÑÒÐÈÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÀÐÊ ÊÀÊ ÔÎÐÌÀ ÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÑÒÂÅÍÍÎÉ ÎÐÃÀÍÈÇÀÖÈÈ ÂÛÑÎÊÎÒÅÕÍÎËÎÃÈ×ÍÎÃÎ ÌÀËÎÃÎ ÁÈÇÍÅÑÀ
NIKOLAY V. MAMAKOV, ARTHUR A. LANTSOV, INDUSTRIAL PARK AS A FORM OF SPATIAL ORGANIZATION OF HIGH-TECH SMALL BUSINESS
ÊÐÀØÅÍÈÍÍÈÊÎÂ À. Â., ÎÁÈÄÆÀÍÎÂ ÀÒÕÀÌ ÀÊÌÀË ÓÃËÈ, ÌÀÕÀËËß ÊÀÊ ÀËÜÒÅÐÍÀÒÈÂÀ ÌÍÎÃÎÊÂÀÐÒÈÐÍÎÌÓ ÃÎÐÎÄÑÊÎÌÓ ÆÈËÈÙÓ
ALEXEY V. KRASHENINNIKOV, ATHAM AKMAL UGLI OBIDJANOV, MAKHALLA AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO MULTI-UNIT URBAN HOUSING
ÑÀËßÕÓÒÄÈÍΠÐ.Í., ÔÀÉÇÐÀÕÌÀÍÎÂÀ Ã.Ð., ÊÓÄÐßØÅÂÀ Å.À., ÐßÁÎÂÀ Ä.À. ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÒÀÒÀÐÑÊÈÉ ÎÐÍÀÌÅÍÒ È ÅÃÎ ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÀß ÈÍÒÅÐÏÐÅÒÀÖÈß Â ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÅ È ÄÈÇÀÉÍÅ ÃÎÐÎÄÑÊÎÉ ÑÐÅÄÛ ÊÀÇÀÍÈ
RISHAT N. SALYAKHUTDINOV, GUZEL R. FAIZRAKHMANOVA, ELENA A. KUDRYASHEVA, DARIYA À. RYABOVA, NATIONAL TATAR ORNAMENT AND ITS MODERN INTERPRETATION IN ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN OF THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT OF KAZAN
ÒÊÀ×Å Â.Í., ÊÀÑÓÌ Ñ. ÔÜÞÆÍ-ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÀ ×ÅÐÍÎÉ ÀÔÐÈÊÈ
VALENTIN N. TKACHEV, SORO KASUM, FUSION ARCHITECTURE OF BLACK AFRICA
ÔÀÇËÅÅÂ Ì. Ø., ÒÓÕÔÅÅÂÀ Ê. Ð. ÐÀÇÂÈÒÈÅ ÔÓÍÊÖÈÉ ÂÎÐÎÒ ÍÀ ÏÐÈÌÅÐÀÕ ÈÇ ÈÑÒÎÐÈÈ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÛ
MARAT SH. FAZLEEV, KAMILLA R. TUKHFEEVA, DEVELOPMENT OF GATE FUNCTIONS USING EXAMPLES FROM THE HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
ÁÀÐÀÍÎÂÀ À. Þ., ÒÎÊÓÍÎÂÀ Ã. Ô., ÎÑÎÊÈÍ À. È., ×ÅÐÍÛÕ À. Ã. ÈÍÒÅÃÐÀÖÈß ÑÏÎÐÒÈÂÍÎÉ È ÇÅËÅÍÎÉ ÈÍÔÐÀÑÒÐÓÊÒÓÐ ÍÀ ÏÐÈÌÅÐÅ ÃÎÐÎÄΠÔÈÍËßÍÄÈÈ
ANNA YU. BARANOVA, GALINA F. TOKUNOVA, ANATOLY I. OSOKIN, ALEXANDER G. CHERNYKH, INTEGRATING SPORTS AND GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE: EXAMPLES FROM FINNISH CITIES
ÔÀÇËÅÅÂ Ì. Ø., ØÀÃÈÀÕÌÅÒÎÂÀ Ý. È. ÈÑÒÎÐÈß ÐÀÇÂÈÒÈß ÎÁÙÅÑÒÂÅÍÍÛÕ ÔÎÍÒÀÍÎÂ ÃÎÐÎÄÀ ÊÀÇÀÍÈ
MARAT SH. FAZLEEV, ELVIRA I. SHAGIAKHMETOVA,THE HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC FOUNTAINS IN KAZAN
ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÛÅ ÄÈÑÑÅÐÒÀÖÈÈ: ÇÀÃËÀÂÈß È ÒÅÌÛ // ARCHITECTURAL THESES: TITLES AND THEMES
ÊÈßÍÅÍÊÎ Ê. Â. ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÛÅ ÄÈÑÑÅÐÒÀÖÈÈ: ÑÒÐÓÊÒÓÐÛ ÇÀÃËÀÂÈÉ
KONSTANTIN V. KIYANENKO, ARCHITECTURAL DISSERTATIONS: STRUCTURES OF TITLES
ÏÐÎÔÅÑÑÈÎÍÀËÜÍÀß ÐÅÏËÈÊÀ // PROFESSOONAL REPLICA
ÀÁÐÓÊÎÂÀ Å. Ð. ÔÈÍÀÍÑÈÐÎÂÀÍÈÅ ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÛÕ ÒÅÕÍÎËÎÃÈÉ Â ÐÀÁÎÒÀÕ ÏÎ ÑÎÕÐÀÍÅÍÈÞ ÊÓËÜÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÍÀÑËÅÄÈß
ELIZAVETA R. ABRUKOVA, FINANCING OF MODERN TECHNOLOGIES IN CULTURAL HERITAGE PRESERVATION WORKS
ÁÀÆÅÍÎÂÀ Å. Ñ., ÁÀÆÅÍÎÂ À. Â. ÐÎËÜ ÏÐÎÔÅÑÑÈÎÍÀËÜÍÎÃÎ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÑÎÎÁÙÅÑÒÂÀ Â ÐÀÇÂÈÒÈÈ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÍÈß Â ÐÎÑÑÈÈ
ELENA S. BAZHENOVA, ALEXANDER V. BAZHENOV,THE ROLE OF PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL COMMUNITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION IN RUSSIA
ÒÊÀ×Å Â.Í. ÏÐÈÇÍÀÊÈ ÍÅÎÒÅÍÈÈ Â ÝÂÎËÞÖÈÈ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÛ
VALENTIN N. TKACHEV, SIGNS OF NEOTENY IN THE EVOLUTION OF ARCHITECTURE
×ÅÐÊÀÑΠÃ.Í. PARTE TOTA ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÛ Â ÏÐÎÖÅÑÑÅ ÝÂÎËÞÖÈÈ ÍÀ ÐÓÁÅÆÅ XX È XXI ÂÅÊÎÂ
GEORGIY N. CHERKASOV, PARTE TOTA OF ARCHITECTURE IN THE PROCESS OF EVOLUTION AT THE TURN OF THE XX AND XXI CENTURIES
ÒÅÇÀÓÐÓÑ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÌÅÍÒÀËÈÒÅÒÀ ÕÕI ÂÅÊÀ // THESAURUS
ÎÊÅÀÍÀÐÈÓÌ — ÓÍÈÊÀËÜÍÛÉ ÍÀÓ×ÍÎ-ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÒÅËÜÍÛÉ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÛÉ ÎÁÚÅÊÒ (ÒÓÐÃÓÌÁÅÊÎÂÀ Ý.Ç., ÀÁÀÅÂÀ Ì.Ð., ÊÎÍÅÂÀ Å.Â.)
ÀÂÒÎÐÛ ÍÎÌÅÐÀ
